Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Hive: How we strived for a clean fork

    July 25, 2026

    Samson Mow says SATA rebound could pull Strategy’s STRC to par

    July 24, 2026

    Haliey Welch isn’t listed in HAWK memecoin lawsuit

    July 24, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Cryptify Now
    • Home
    • Features
      • Typography
      • Contact
      • View All On Demos
    • Typography
    • Buy Now
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Cryptify Now
    You are at:Home » Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage
    Ethereum

    Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

    Olivia MartinezBy Olivia MartinezJuly 24, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

    Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

    Detailed description:

    Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

    This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

    Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

    • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

    Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

    The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
    Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

    The following contracts may be affected:
    Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

    Types smaller than 256 bits include:
    bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

    Recommended action:

    • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
    • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

    This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCoinbase lets businesses accept USDC payments from AI agents
    Next Article Aave proposal to peg Ethena’s USDe to USDT raises concerns
    Olivia Martinez

    Related Posts

    Hive: How we strived for a clean fork

    July 25, 2026

    Onward from the Hard Fork

    July 24, 2026

    On Inflation, Transaction Fees and Cryptocurrency Monetary Policy

    July 24, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Chinese chip used in bitcoin wallets is putting traders at risk

    May 25, 2026

    The civil war inside Cardano: Hoskinson vs the foundation

    May 25, 2026

    Anchorage Digital probed by top US AML task force, report

    May 25, 2026

    SurgeXRP presale crosses 10% soft cap, this could be the XRPL RWA token to watch in 2026

    May 25, 2026
    Don't Miss

    Hive: How we strived for a clean fork

    By Olivia MartinezJuly 25, 2026

    The DAO soft-fork attempt was difficult. Not only did it turn out that we underestimated…

    Samson Mow says SATA rebound could pull Strategy’s STRC to par

    July 24, 2026

    Haliey Welch isn’t listed in HAWK memecoin lawsuit

    July 24, 2026

    Onward from the Hard Fork

    July 24, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    CryptifyNow: Your daily source for the latest insights, news, and analysis in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    Hive: How we strived for a clean fork

    July 25, 2026

    Samson Mow says SATA rebound could pull Strategy’s STRC to par

    July 24, 2026

    Haliey Welch isn’t listed in HAWK memecoin lawsuit

    July 24, 2026
    Lithosphere News Releases
    Copyright © 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.